Guidelines for Advancement Under the Step Plus System for the Continuing Educator Series

These are interim guidelines. These guidelines are to be used in addition to the policies, procedures, and exhibits provided in the Academic Personnel Manual (APM) and APM-UCD.

Principles for Advancement

All Continuing Educators are eligible for advancement review at normative time for their rank and step determined by system-wide policy. In formulating criteria for recommending greater than 1.0-step advancements, a balance has been sought between concreteness and flexibility. The criteria for advancement are clarified without specific quantitative assessments that understate or overstate the total contributions of candidates. The five areas of review are academic planning and curriculum development, program administration/management/marketing, human resource management and development, professional competence and university and public service. University and public service duties are expected to increase as Continuing Educators advance in rank and step. In all cases, based on the candidate’s achievements, chairs and deans should articulate in the department and dean’s letters the grounds for advancement beyond simple numerical tabulations by describing the special impact or quality of the work or the scale and scope of the undertaking.

One-Step Advancement

A balanced record, appropriate for rank and step as stated in the APM 340, with evidence of a meritorious record of accomplishments in all areas of review is rewarded with a 1.0-step advancement.

One and a Half-Step Advancement

A 1.5-step advancement requires not only a meritorious record in the five general areas of review, consistent with the candidate’s position description, but also outstanding achievement in at least one area. Outstanding achievement in one area does not qualify the candidate for 1.5-step advancement if balanced performance is not achieved.

Two-Step Advancement

A 2.0-step advancement will require a meritorious record in the five general areas of review, with outstanding achievement in at least two areas.

Advancement greater than Two Steps

An advancement greater than 2.0 steps will be extremely rare. These advancements will require outstanding levels of achievement in all areas of review.